Dr Oz: Whats in the Nation’s Chicken? Roxarsone & Antibiotics

Doctor Oz Diet, Recipe & Lifestyle Advice

Advertisement

Dr Oz: Whats in the Nation’s Chicken? Roxarsone & Antibiotics

By on October 7, 2010

Doctor Oz did a show called “What’s in the Nation’s Chicken?”  Do you know what is in the chicken you and your family are eating?  Your chicken could contain Roxarsone, an organic form of arsenic!  Dr Oz said that today’s chickens are bigger than they have ever been, because of the drugs and antibiotics we are pumping into them.  Dr Oz put America’s chicken in the truth tube, and I am sure that tons of people were shocked.  I have personally been buying strictly organic chicken for the past half a year or so, but now I am going to be even more careful about eating chicken at restaurants where the chicken is not organic. Dr Oz Roxarsone

Dr Oz knows that when we walk down the grocery aisle for chicken there are tons of options: roasters, chicken nuggets, breasts and thighs.  Apparently, there are only 4 companies that supply 50% of the supply of chickens in this country.  And as Dr Oz said, Old McDonald is a bio-engineer now.  Chickens are given Roxarsone, an organic arsenic, kept inside with no sunlight and are crowded so that they cannot move and will grow faster.  Then when the chickens reach 5 pounds they are sent off to be killed, injected with salt and shipped to your grocery store.

Dr Oz said that in addition to Roxarsone, the following are often pumped into chicken that we eat: Monosodium Glutamate, Sodium Erythorbate, Trisodium Phosphate (a cleaning agent) and salt.

Dr Oz: Major Difference in Today’s Chicken

1.  Chicken Size

Dr Oz said that in the 1950′s, a typical chicken weighed 3 pounds.  Now, chickens typically weigh 5 pounds.  Urvashi Rangan from Consumer Reports said that they ran a lot of tests to see why chickens are so much larger now than just two generations ago.  After WWII, America began to optimize chicken to have more breast meat, thigh meat and to grow larger in general.  However, at the same time, they noticed that if you are going to pack chicken in tight quarters, you have to also give them antibiotics to keep them well.

2.  Antibiotics in Chicken Feed

Dr Oz thinks that the biggest change in chickens is that now many chickens get antibiotics in their daily feed, regardless of whether or not they are sick.  David Kessler, author of The End of Overeating, said that antibiotics are used in chicken feed for three reasons:

- To treat disease

- To prevent diseases they might get

- To increase the chicken’s growth rate

And this last one is the biggest concern to Kessler, because using antibiotics to increase a chicken’s size is an abuse of antibiotics and can increase drug resistance.  Back in the 1950′s, it took chickens 85 days to reach maturity, whereas now, chicken’s reach maturity in 47 days.  The way corporate America looks at it, the bigger the chicken and the faster it can get to the large size, the more profits for them.

3.  Chicken Growth Rate

Dr Oz also brought on Dr Robert Lawrence who explained that for chickens to grow much faster, the bacteria in the chicken’s guts must be minimized, because bacteria in a chicken’s gut compete for what the chicken’s consume.  So the less bacteria in the gut, the faster the chicken can grow.  Dr Oz is concerned because he has seen people die from super bugs caused by drug resistance.

Dr Rangan said that Consumer Reports did a study on Antibiotic Resistance and found that the following antibiotic resistance in bacteria in chicken: Tetracycline, Amoxicillin, Ampicillin and Ciprofloxacin.  Dr Oz said that Ciprofloxacin is one of the most powerful antibiotics that we have, so its very scary that 2/3 of the pathogens found were resistant to one or more of these antibiotics.  Dr Oz also said that we are unable to find out exactly how many antibiotics are given to chicken.  While the FDA and CDC have given careful guidelines to restrict the overuse of antibiotics in the food supply chain, there is definitely a large concern that these restrictions simply are not enough.

4. Roxarsone: Organic Arsenic

Dr Oz said that Roxarsone is given to chickens to prevent them from getting sick, but it is also a growth promoter and has the side benefit of adding a yellow color to the chicken’s skin.  Several benefits of Roxarsone are that it shortens the time of getting the bird to market weight and it treats parasites to keep the chicken healthy.  While organic arsenic is currently considered relatively safe, we all know how dangerous inorganic arsenic is.  We have to weight the benefits (like preventing parasites such as Salmonella) with the risks.

Dr Oz finished by saying that he has no doubt that our behavior as consumers drives the chicken industry.  So if we buy organic antibiotic free chicken, it will shift the industry, but of course the FDA can and should be tougher as well.  For now though, we have to look out for our own good and not depend on agencies like the FDA.  So jump on the bandwagon with me (and Dr Oz) and only buy Organic Chicken!

Don't forget to like us on Facebook and to follow us on Twitter and on Pinterest!


Comments to Dr Oz: Whats in the Nation’s Chicken? Roxarsone & Antibiotics

  1. Dr. Cluck says:

    Dr. Oz as usual you are misinformed and need to consult real experts in the field of poultry production. Organic chicken has an equal or higher liklihood of containing Salmonella. And you know what– you can kill all Salmonella by cooking your food. Imagine that, instead of filling consumer’s minds full of lies you could actually use this opportunity to educate the consumer so they dont end up in physician’s offices in the first place. Furthermore, there has never been a scientific link to antibiotic resistance in animals and humans. Most antibiotic resistance is due to voeruse in the medical community, by wack-job charlatans such as yourself.

  2. Dr Cluck… I can’t speak on behalf of Dr Oz, because we are not affiliated with him at all… however, I don’t think Dr Oz was implying that organic or non-organic chicken are more likely to have Salmonella. I think the biggest concern is the concept of using antibiotics in the chicken’s feed, especially for reasons like to make the chickens grow bigger and / or grow faster. On a humane level, I also do not think it is appropriate for any animal to be kept in such tight quarters and never (or for very short periods of time) to be allowed to roam free outside. That is just my two cents…

  3. John Simms says:

    The FDA is a bunch of jokers. Probably on the take. Or just plain incompetent. I’ll only buy organic chicken from here on out. Although I’m not real sure it’s safe either.

  4. I have tutored biology for many years and it is highly feasible that consumption of animal protein that is resistant to antibiotics can be passed on to human beings. Why do I say this? I say this because diseases can and do spread from animals to humans and vice versa. The avian flu being a recent example. The one thing that gets me is that many times common sense is not used in so-called scientific thinking. For example, Kuru disease is a neurological disorder that is caused by cannibalism or people eating people. Mad cow disease is caused by cows eating cow, I quote, “A British inquiry into BSE concluded that the epizootic was caused by cattle, who are normally herbivores, being fed the remains of other cattle in the form of meat and bone meal (MBM), which caused the infectious agent to spread”. Do we have to wait to find a link between human resistance to disease and animal resistance with the evidence that we already have in related circumstances? Besides, Dr. Oz is a doctor and has have many years of biological studies under his belt. Check out the curriculum for becoming a doctor for yourself. I am not a fan of Dr. Oz, however the main point that should be made is science as it is practiced is based on hypothetical thinking.

    b

    for

  5. Reality Check says:

    Ok, so we know if we take too many antibiotics, germs and other buggies develop resistance – good reason to not dose chickens and cattle as antibiotics and other chemicals remain present in the meat/milk/egg – we need some natural immunity again – our grandparents had it but we have so sanitized our lives, a simple bug could kill us. Admin, do you like veal? Calves are kept in very close quarters, fed milk for a certain length of time, then slaughtered – it’s been done for centuries – get over the whole poor animal mentality, although I do agree there is no reason to keep all animals confined – go after the estrogen manufacturers instead of the chicken industry. There are natural alternatives for hormone therapy, but it’s better (so we’re told) to keep mares pregnant to harvest their urine. There’s even less justification there than for poor, trapped chickens.

  6. So which companies do we avoid?That’s really what it comes down to since they do not list these things on the package.

  7. @ Dr. Cluck: sounds like your the one that is misinformed. The FDA just proved that the carcasses of chicken fed organic arsenic, contain high amounts of inorganic arsenic.

    http://indianapublicmedia.org/eartheats/arsenic-chicken-feed-pulled-fdas-independent-testing/
    and yes resistant bacteria in chicken can infect humans. The e-coli in your gut has the ability to pick up resistance from other bacteria.

Write a Comment

Current day month ye@r *

DrOzFans.com is not endorsed by or in any way affiliated with Dr. Mehmet Oz, ZoCo Productions LLC or to ZoCo 1 LLC. ZoCo 1 LLC is the owner of the following trademarks: DR. OZ™, ASK DR. OZ™ and THE DOCTOR OZ SHOW™. We are an independent and unofficial fan and news site unrelated to any of the entities above.